Fairness is Pleasing to the Sight

“All virtue is summed up in dealing justly.” (Aristotle, The Nicomachean Ethics)

“My little Pierre is now nearly five years old. He is quite a big boy. I used to wait with impatience for the time when I could take him with me and talk with him, opening his young mind, instilling into him the love of beauty and truth, and helping fashion for him so lofty a soul that the ugliness of life could not degrade it.” (Alfred Dreyfus, Five Years of My Life)

“Nothing is fair in this world. You might as well get that straight right now.” (Sue Monk Kidd, The Secret Life of Bees)

“Can you speak, can you hear, can you see and read, where is your higher IQ? - Be bold to the world and say clear, YES or NO. Be free and set free; it is fairness.” (Ehsan Sehgal)

“For God shows no partiality.” (Rom. 2:11)

I fondly remember a soft-spoken monk in one of the monastic communities I have visited who has left a lasting impression on me. He was elderly and wise. He had earnt the right to be considered for the abbot’s position two previous times. On each of these occasions his nomination was dismissed in favour of younger and less experienced monastics. From the outside it was a plainly unfair decision. I asked him if this biased treatment against him wounded him in any way. He smiled and looked at me with the eyes of an owl which are noted for their depth perception. “It is their way of asking me questions,” he serenely said, “it would be unfair if I disappointed them and caused one to stumble.” Such conversations cannot be misplaced. [1] They are as precious as desert wildflowers.  Later that evening during the vespers service:

 “If you, O Lord, should mark iniquities, Lord who could stand? But there is forgiveness with you.” (Ps. 129:5)

Is there fairness in the world? Or at least in our community? Something “fair” in the olden times was considered “pleasing to the sight”. Today we still say that the weather is fair. There is something attractive to this etymological transmission of the word. Nowadays, by fair we normally understand “free of bias and injustice”. Many people would claim there is more bias and injustice in the world than there is impartiality and justice. Even the shortest survey of recent history would appear to overwhelmingly support this position. “Being good is easy,” wrote Victor Hugo the author of Les Misérables, “what is difficult is being just.” Though surely there is charity and compassion in the world, consider our  selfless frontline workers during the pandemic, we can add to the injustice even in our small neighbourhoods by engaging in practises of bias. Apposite to note the delicate but significant difference between the words ‘justice’ and ‘fairness’: “Justice should be defined as adherence to rules of conduct, whereas fairness should be defined as individuals’ moral evaluations of this conduct.”[2]

To treat someone unfairly, and particularly a young person, can prove terrible in many ways: blunting their dreams; lowering their self-esteem; and diminishing their promise. In what ways might we treat someone unfairly? Of course, there is discrimination bias based on how we look or what we believe in, that is, we can consciously [or sometimes even unconsciously] discriminate by placing people into perceptual stereotypes. This is to ignore the uniqueness and the many different qualities that the ‘other’ possesses in their presence and being. Then there is nepotism as well, the favouring of relatives or friends over others which can  be practised in all strata of our society, but here it can be especially harmful when those discriminated against are our children. Other times, too, we can rob someone of their prospects by overlooking their claims to a promotion or an employment opportunity in favour of another who is less qualified. It is to become a deliberate obstacle in someone else’s ‘capability’. It can be thought of as an act of theft. We rob another of their potential, their ‘power’. Envy, revenge, or another of the passions, can also be a cause for our unfair treatment of another.

This is how I started on this little reflection, but as I was completing the last paragraphs I couldn’t much as I tried, get a recent image out of my mind. The pictures of those seven beautiful children killed in that drone attack gone horribly wrong in Kabul, Afghanistan. Initially described by Pentagon officials as a “righteous strike”.[3] Five of the children were five years or younger. Baby Aya was not yet two. It took me back to another unforgettable image which I also cannot erase from my memory. This was during the first Gulf War (1991). The then Prime Minister of the United Kingdom was pictured celebrating his birthday, playing a guitar on the front page of a daily newspaper. Below on the same page was a picture of a young Iraqi boy. He had lost his limbs in another bombing gone ‘wrong’. What to say here on ‘fairness’? There are no adequate responses, but only as most sages have agreed and argued for in their respective works, long processes of reconciliation.

Of course, such emblematic instances as the two mentioned above, are too many, particularly from the 20th century. There would be no end to the examples, both before and after the Holocaust (the Shoah). Then there are the cancer wards where other children go. These are sufferings of another unalterable kind. The study of the writings of Primo Levi, Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Geoffrey Robertson, Paul Johnson, and Martha Minow are a good place to start to get a visceral image of these ever-present realities.[4] And so the remembrance of these universal and more vital things stopped me from continuing with the original purpose of this upload. It was to be some thoughts on the unfair treatment of a fine young man by a community of people he had once trusted from the times he was a little boy, and the lessons drawn from that heart-rending experience.

Yet here is the difference between the violent and indiscriminate taking away of a life, and in particular a young life which has not yet blossomed, to the ‘normal’ unfairness in the world which we ourselves might have experienced or have seen played out in the lives of others, including oftentimes our children. We are still alive, our young ones have the use of their limbs and the exercise of their imaginations, and if we live in the affluent places of the world, we have a warm bed, a roof over our heads, and in the evenings an excess of food on our tables. We can move on, looking forwards, knowing that doors will inevitably shut, but if we should only endure [sooner or later], others will open. The revered mystic and Bengali polymath Rabindranath Tagore has described it this way: “If I can't make it through one door, I'll go through another door- or I’ll make a door. Something terrific will come no matter how dark the present.” Greater things have very often been found on the other side of providence. Persecution of diverse kind has been overcome and restoration has come to the wronged. Ultimately, if we are to measure fairness by any rule, we will all leave the world having experienced unfairness one way or another and lived through its sharp irony and stinging pain. It hurts to feel you have not been valued. It is a basic human need. Yet, it is also a well-known fact, resentment and vengeance only build up anger and bad decision-making. Outside any religious paradigms, numerous studies have found that forgiveness which can be “practised” and “cultivated”, and does not mean to condone the wrongdoing, has a long list of positive effects.[5]

Source: Katina Michael

Source: Katina Michael

There is fairness only in death. It cares nothing for our name and accomplishments. Our reputations have nil effect. It has no interest in our religion nor in our creeds. “Death is the fairest thing in the world” writes Svetlana Aleksievich the author of Voices from Chernobyl,[6] “[n]o one's ever gotten out of it. The earth takes everyone.” The Book of Ecclesiastes and the ‘eight worldly dharmas’ considered in Buddhism, have a great deal to say on the weight, and the ultimate futility, of putting too much credence into life’s self-centred preoccupations or allowing ourselves to be defined by others. In the meantime without sugar-coating reality, we allow for the excitement of new opportunities. The anticipation of emboldening challenges when we have been “shut out”. Perspective always remains a tremendous help.

Postscript The young man who inspired this post in the first place is doing well. Away from the football field he is enjoying the piano.


[1] This little but telling exchange is from a much longer conversation which took place in Thessaloniki, Greece, one Saturday afternoon and is here paraphrased.
[2] https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/job.1956

[3] https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/10/world/asia/us-air-strike-drone-kabul-afghanistan-isis.html

[4] Martha Minow, Between Vengeance and Forgiveness: Facing History after Genocide and Mass Violence, (Beacon Press: Boston, 1998).

[5] https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/topic/forgiveness/definition

[6] https://www.amazon.com/Voices-Chernobyl-History-Nuclear-Disaster/dp/0312425848

On Chance Encounters

Saturday 6th August, 2011

Sydney, NSW

Kingsford Smith International Airport, Montreux Jazz Café

The ritual before take-off

“Thank you. One sugar, please…”

“So where are you off too then?”

“Europe… Bucharest.”

“Business or pleasure?”

Neither…

“What else is there?” The young waitress asks.

“The great abyss,” I reply.

We both laugh for different reasons.

The young waitress dressed in black from head to toe with a striking gold breastpin of a frog with red glass eyes, retreats and moves speedily back into her own world. And I weep in secretum, reflecting on the infallible revelation of how quickly all things must come to pass.

 

Source: MG Michael Family Archives

Source: MG Michael Family Archives

Tuesday 16th August, 2011

Bucharest, Romania

Readers Cafe

Another of those wonderful chance encounters

“I have been watching you write.”

“Yes, it helps.”

“Can I ask what about?”

“I am not sure, probably about climbing mountains. That’s close enough.”

“Are you a monk or something? You look like a monk.”

“No, once, a long time ago, but it is a little complicated.”

“I’m Susanna. My friends call me Vagvadini.”

“I’m Michael. My friends used to call me Jeremiah.”

Remember these conversations my heart to prize them deeply for when you get lost in the years ahead. Precious landmarks along the way. They are not pretend colloquies which bring sickness to the soul.

Hop, Skip, and Jump

September 17th 2011

Bucharest, Romania

Christina Hotel

 

Hold fast onto your dreams

You tell me you want to see your name in one of my stories. I really don’t know why. I am not who you think I am. I do write, yes, but more than likely what I scribble down will be lost or deleted, or dismissed as having possessed little value. So, okay, dearest Alina, consider yourself amongst my lost and found. Hold fast onto your dreams and never betray the fairy tale in your heart which makes you hop, skip, and jump when you serve my breakfast in the morning. And remember, when you fall into quicksand the mistake is to panic and to fight against it. The secret, they say, is to relax as best you can and slowly waddle yourself out. Other times, you will know when, think of the jet pilots who must go full throttle when landing on the flight deck lest they miss the bands and drop into water.

 I have been thinking of Saint Lucia, too, who brings light into the darkness; and of the great white shark which crashes into the Cape fur seal. Tossing it into the air.

 Later that day

 It was not as a tourist that I made the long journey here, to this country riddled with uncertainties which on a map gives you the impression of a gigantic flower. And it was only during the days of my preparation to leave Sydney I discovered that outside Russia, something which I should have remembered from my seminary days, it is in Romania where you will find the most populous Eastern Orthodox community. Excepting for those few days in Brasov [and the train ride through Transylvania], I stayed put in Bucharest. I made the conscious decision to avoid too much sensory input, to keep focused on the reasons for my being here. The important thing providence again proved right. This is where I had to come.  Nil sine numine

It is the same with where I will go tomorrow. Joseph Conrad, Vladimir Nabokov and others like them who have come to English as a second language, have revealed that a foreign place can be like learning to use another tongue. Not only in the rewarding search for nuances in the back streets of small and great cities, but also in the translation of ‘the rivers’ which like the twists and turns in our stories, run through us.

 “…we all have a right to speak, and an obligation/ to pay attention to the slightest whisper.” (John Tranter, Whisper)

 “We must continue to speak: although the language we use/ is like sand, it is desire that whets it, that sometimes/ fuses it into glass.” (David Brooks, True Language)

For the temptingness of the metaphor itself

27th May, 2011

Sydney, Kingsgrove

“Find out the reason that commands you to write; see whether it has spread its roots into the very depth of your heart; confess to yourself you would have to die if you were forbidden to write.” (Rainer Maria Rilke)

“Any writer worth his salt writes to please himself… It’s a self-exploratory operation that is endless. An exorcism of not necessarily his demon, but of his divine discontent.” (Harper Lee)

"One day I will find the right words, and they will be simple." (Jack Kerouac)

“There is no greater agony than bearing an untold story inside you.” (Maya Angelou)

“Writers are the exorcists of their own demons.” (Mario Vargas-Llosa)

“To touch the heart. Yes, that we appeal both to the heart and the mind, in so doing reveal the richness and horror of life, to expose the hidden life.” (Nick Kyriacos)

“With writing, we have second chances.” (Jonathan Safran Foer)

 

To write is to ‘carve’ or to ‘sketch’. Yes, that sounds right, even if it might be for the temptingness of the metaphor itself.

Courtesy of Eleni Michael (Michael Family Archives)

Courtesy of Eleni Michael (Michael Family Archives)

So why exactly am I doing this? Engaging in this ofttimes painful process of the ‘carving’. Do I know… will I ever really know? There are times when I think I have hit on the answer or to have discovered the good clues. Is it a need that I can’t rightly describe? In some measure it has to do with repair and reconciliation. The Dominican-American writer and MIT professor Junot Díaz has put it much better: “Because I can’t seem to escape it [writing]. It’s a way for me to address and counter my questions about what it means to be human.”[1] It is because we are not one but many which makes this such an unforgiving task: to not only put down the essence of “who” we are but to bring together the many into the one.[2] So if the metaphysics alone weren’t enough, there is also the lasting fear of getting it wrong, to give those who might one day be reading our pages a different picture to what we are trying to piece together, like a tricky puzzle or an ancient mosaic. Of course, some pieces of the picture will remain forever lost or hidden, either by design or accident. Those pieces which are too humiliating to document, (but which if we are to be honest, we should as a minimum leave some plain hints behind). The ledger, however, has to be balanced. That is, maybe we should also not be too quick to include those other admittedly fewer pieces which might reveal a loftier spirit inhabiting this contradiction of a ragbag heart and bruised bone. There are at least a couple of things which we can take hope from, lest as C.S. Lewis says, our efforts at writing do not simply become an occasion for “vainglory”. Most of us move somewhere in between those two extremes: ‘the saint and the sinner’. That is, we are neither too much of the one, and hopefully, not too much of the other. We inhabit the pulsating skins of both. So if we write, it would be good to admit to this, for otherwise our words could fall into the extremes and then we would be entering into the realms of caricature and fiction. We try to pull the saint and the little devil closer into the middle, like when you pull on a rope, and the rope pulls back against you, and see what happens after we let go. The exciting part to all of this, that these two entities (“saint” and “sinner”) are different for each one of us. Informed by different life-legends and experiences. This fact alone makes our story and our art unique expressions of human existence, and worthy of a creative process and broader sharing. We are the “participant-observers” to our story.[3] The other truth? We are ultimately, all of us connected by the one and the same quest: to be Saved… or to at least fill in the gaps.


[1] This telling quote from JD was later added to this entry on 23rd August, 2021.

[2] See Richard David Precht’s fabulous philosophical and readable analysis into the “heart of human existence”: Who Am I?: And If So How Many? (New York: Random House, 2011). https://www.amazon.com/Who-Am-If-How-Many/dp/0385531184

[3] https://www.research.ed.ac.uk/en/publications/participant-observation-2

Michael Eldred on the Digital Age: Challenges for Today’s Thinking

Available from Amazon.com here and other leading bookstores.

This is the second book published by M&K Press in the Technology and Society series. Book one with Bishop Kallistos Ware is available here.

Description

The description was written by Michael Eldred.

This little book takes on a series of questions posed by M.G. Michael and Katina Michael. The responses are not conclusive, but rather intended to make the profound challenges presented by the Digital Age visible. These include: How does consciousness differ from psyche? What is the relationship between Artificial Intelligence and the mind? How are visions of transhumanism to be assessed? Why is it important to distinguish between 'what' and 'who'? Who are we to become in the cyberworld? How do the cyberworld and the gainful game of capitalism intermesh? Are ubiquitous surveillance, Überveillance and the loss of privacy inevitable in the Digital Age? Are questions of ethics questions of power?


It is commonplace to say that today we are living in the Digital Age. This period is characterized by the advent of the cyberworld that is populated by bit-strings of data being processed by algorithms. Algorithms themselves are also nothing other than bit-strings composed of binary digits, i.e., zeroes and ones. The result is a third bit-string that triggers an effect either within the cyberworld or outside , in our old, familiar, physical world. The effect could be to send off an e-mail from one electronic server to the digital address of another, a receiving electronic server. Or it could be the command to launch a deadly missile into the sky. The elementary processing unit at the very core of the cyberworld is the Universal Turing Machine that has algorithms copulate with digital data to produce effective offspring. Such a machine does not exist anywhere as a real, physical thing but is 'merely' an idea, a mathematical idea that has turned out to be immensely powerful.


This idea of a cyberworld inhabited by Universal Turing Machines has materialized within a very few decades to make a digital world with which we have to contend every day. For the algorithms now rule our lives. They enable us to do many things, and prevent us just as much from doing other things. Wrongly coded algorithms can wreak havoc in people's lives. Other algorithms enable life-saving surgery to be performed with hitherto unknown precision. So is it just a matter of weighing up the pros and cons of what the cyberworld has to offer us? Or are we challenged to think more deeply about just what this cyberworld is and what is driving it?


Techniques and technologies have been known for millennia all over the world, but the idea of what technology is was interrogated by Greek philosophy. The very conception of what is understood in the West as knowledge is tied to and intimately interwoven with how the Greeks understood technology, the art of making things: A skilful power, the know-how, acts upon material to produce an effect. Technology is effective! This is seemingly a trivial observation hardly worth mentioning. But what seems trivial is the hallmark of philosophical questions that open up abysses for the mind to fathom. What lies hidden behind the idea of effective knowledge is the unbounded will to power over every conceivable kind of movement and change.


Is the cyberworld that is today increasingly encroaching upon and becoming a surrogate for the physical world in countless ways the consummation of this absolute, effective will to power over movement? Are the algorithms the digital encoding of an understanding of one sort of movement that is outsourced from our mind to the cyberworld to produce effects, to steer movements, for better or for worse? Are the algorithms the digitization of our logical understanding in which the logos itself has been encoded as a digital bit-string and now operates autonomously out there in the cyberworld, only seemingly still under our control?

Author Information

About the author:

Michael Eldred was born in 1952 in Katoomba and grew up in Leura and Katoomba in the Blue Mountains close to Sydney. He started studies in 1970 at the University of Sydney, first completing two science degrees majoring in mathematics, but including one year of philosophy. In 1975 he returned to philosophy, experiencing in 1976, through a visiting lecturer from Constance named Volkbert ‘Mike’ Roth, his introduction to the then-current, ongoing German discussion aiming at a critical reassessment and reconstruction of Marx’s encompassing project of a theory of bourgeois society. The debate had been triggered by Hans-Georg Backhaus, one of Adorno’s students, by a seminar paper Backhaus delivered in 1965. Marx himself had only ever completed multiple drafts for the first part of his six-part project under the title of Das Kapital: Kritik der politischen Ökonomie. He left behind not even completed drafts of his original plans for a comprehensive theory of the bourgeois ‘superstructure’. Eldred was awarded his PhD by the General Philosophy Department at Sydney University in 1984 with a dissertation on the reconstruction and extension of a form-analytic theory of capitalist society in a critical engagement especially with Marx and Hegel. Eldred was a tutor in both pure mathematics and philosophy at Sydney University and has taught courses at Constance University, the Pädagogische Hochschule in Munich, Witten-Herdecke University and for the Daseinsanalytische Gesellschaft in Zürich.

By translating Peter Sloterdijk’s Critique of Cynical Reason in 1984 for Minnesota U.P., he came across Heidegger’s Being and Time and phenomenology of the Heideggerian kind. This provided the impulse for intensive study of Heidegger’s writings that led him to the Greeks, especially Plato and Aristotle. Heidegger’s earlier lectures opened his eyes to how to read these seminal Western thinkers anew phenomenologically. Already at this time in the mid-1980s, he started a project on the question of whoness (a concept from Being and Time) in relation to an ontological gender difference between masculinity and femininity that resulted in two published books on masculine whoness in German. The interest in gender difference was a legacy of his time in General Philosophy, where feminism in the 1970s was a strong influence. By the early 2000s, the questioning of whoness had transformed into a wider socio-ontological inquiry, including questions of values as well as social and political power, and culminating in his Social Ontology of Whoness: Rethinking core phenomena of political philosophy (2019).

One of the major impulses for Eldred’s work has been to uncover the respective, quasi complementary, blind spots in Marx’s and Heidegger’s thinking, first published in 2000 in German and then in various editions, most recently in 2015, under the title Capital and Technology: Marx and Heidegger.

In 1990 he met the philosopher, Rafael Capurro, with whom he had e-mail correspondence in 1999 that developed the first scant outlines of a digital ontology. This intial exchange bore fruit as several articles and books by Eldred, most recently in his Movement and Time in the Cyberworld: Questioning the Digital Cast of Being (2019).

Eldred earned his livelihood from 1985 on as a freelance translator, gradually becoming specialized in contemporary-art catalogues. This occupation had the side-benefit of maintaining his independence from the rules of play in academic institutions and leaving him time for philosophical work.

He started playing guitar at the age of ten, which has accompanied him throughout his life. In recent years he has recorded several of his own philosophical songs (philorock) on a non-commercial basis and has also published a book on the phenomenology of music.

From a first marriage he has a daughter, Rachel Eldred, who lives in Sydney, and from a fateful encounter at a conference in Hamburg under the title Eros, Liebe, Sexus at the end of Septermber 1990, he has a philosopher-wife, Astrid Nettling, with whom he lives in Cologne.

About the editors:

Michaels high-res.jpg

MG Michael and Katina Michael have been formally collaborating on technology and society issues since 2002. MG Michael holds a PhD in theology and Katina Michael in information and communication technology. Together they hold eight degrees in a variety of disciplines including Philosophy, Linguistics, Ancient History, Law and National Security. MG Michael is formerly an honorary associate professor in the School of Computing and Information Technology at the University of Wollongong, and Katina Michael is a professor in the School for the Future of Innovation in Society at Arizona State University. Katina is the editor-in-chief of IEEE Transactions on Technology and Society, and senior editor of IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine. Michael and Katina reside in the Illawarra region in Australia with their three children.

Publishing Details

Publication Date: August 20, 2021
ISBN/EAN13: 1741283388/978-1741283389
Page Count: 84
Binding Type: US Trade Paper
Trim Size: 5.5 x 0.19 x 8.5 inches
Language: English
Color: Full Color
Related Categories: Technology, Ethics, Society