On the Loveliness of my Wonderful Friend Maria Leivaditis

When they exiled us from Paradise, Maria was crying. I then took her to the hotel opposite because we had to get on with life. When we came out it was getting dark. Maria caressed her stomach. “There is hope,” she said. / Hope which makes the world even more uncertain. (T.L., The Manuscripts of Autumn)

His name Jacob, hers the more serene: Maria. They stood upright beneath the trees, with hands clasped … (T.L., Violets for a Season)

“My dearest Aikaterine and Michael

Moon of twenty days… how the years pass. / For our Tasos I make  this reference with slight variation. / Stresses, concerns, running about, / To what end? / “Troubled about many things” indeed. / And so, alas the intervals of silence are prolonged. / Till that time when the final and eternal silence arrives. / However till then receive heartfelt blessings / for Holy Christmas / and the New Year.

Athens 9 Dec. ‘97

I embrace you

Maria Leivaditis”

I have counted it among the great blessings of my life that I have been able to form friendships of a depth and affection that have endured in every season. These strong bonds have oftentimes taken root in places that I could never have imagined for a little boy who grew up in his parents’ milk bar in Sydney’s inner west. Even now, later in life, I have been equally blessed to make new friends whose benevolence has renewed my faith in the goodness of people. The sadness, of course, is that a number of those dear friends are no longer with us. Even as a younger man, I found myself drawn to those souls who were older and wiser. I sought their company, their friendship and their mentoring, and went after them as a bee seeks the good floral oils. One of these beloved friends was a woman of much kindness, boundless generosity, and possessed of a rich life experience garnered in some of the most testing arenas of life. In her later years she became increasingly fragile but she never lost her wit nor the sharpness of her intuition. You would make a serious mistake to underestimate my friend Maria Leivaditis—(it was exactly the same with Gwen Harwood with whom I had a much briefer correspondence but was also the recipient of her strengthening grace). Maria was the wife of one of Greece’s most beloved and admired poets, Tasos Leivaditis (1922-1988).

This time, the focus is not on Tasos, about whom books and dissertations have been written, but precisely on Maria. Nor is this about how I first entered Maria’s orbit some years after Tasos’s passing, as that is another story altogether. Later, I plan to share some of those prized insights that she shared with me to do with the poet’s life, and how it was that we were to become friends. Instead, I want to ensure she is recognised for much more than being Tasos’s faithful and lifelong loyal companion. As I continue to read biographies, I find that the partners of many of our greatest creators, across the humanities and sciences, have too often been dismissed, forgotten, or sidelined. Sophia Tolstaya’s contribution to Tolstoy’s epic War and Peace alone bordered on the superhuman. Then there is Zelda Fitzgerald, whose fingerprints are everywhere to be found in F. Scott Fitzgerald’s novels. Vladimir Nabokov was also very much dependent on his wife, Véra Nabokov, for support and encouragement which he readily acknowledged. Mozart, Bach, and Schumann might not have completed their respective catalogues if not for Constanze, Anna Magdalena, and Clara. It is a long list that touches every discipline. Lee Krasner famously marginalised her own art to support Jackson Pollock, and it was the same with Jo Nivison and Edward Hopper.

Maria would surprise us with copies of Tasos Leivaditis's hand copied drafts. (MG Michael Family Archives)

So now I return to my friend, Maria. These few reminiscences cannot do justice to her life, or to her presence in mine, but I share them nonetheless, to introduce her to those who did not know her. They reflect our years of correspondence and the many phone calls that were exchanged between us. Maria née Stoupa, the second daughter of George and Alexandra, was born sometime in the late 1920s in an inner suburb of Athens. She met the poet when they were both in their teens. They married in 1946 after she had initially resisted as she was still mourning the death of her father who had passed away during the Occupation.[1] The marriage resulted in one child, their beloved daughter, Vaso. Maria and Tasos had one grandchild that they both adored, Stelios-Petros, and presently the curator of an excellent webpage dedicated to his grandfather’s legacy.[2] Tasos was very much in love with Maria and she was in many instances his muse and inspiration. Not rarely, and for no particular reason, she told me, he would surprise her with flowers—and this to the very end of his life. He trusted Maria’s judgement. If she expressed a lingering doubt about something that Tasos would write, for he would read his first drafts to her, he would normally not continue with that piece. But always she would listen, absorbed by his magical stories and only rarely interrupting. So her reflective responses would make a serious impression on the poet. These readings would customarily take place in the evenings, typically in Tasos’s study. In the background there could be music of a diverse genre ranging from the classics (they both held an enduring affinity for Chopin), Greek laïka, of course, and down to contemporary jazz. I know that Maria loved the Greek poets, and especially Angelos Sikelianos and Yiannis Ritsos. She would also speak most warmly to me of Irene Papas, and of Grigoris Bithikotsis—who famously sang Tasos’s Drapetsona and Vrehi sti Ftohogitonia set to music by Mikis Theodorakis.[3]

From Left to right, Vaso, Maria, Tasos, and Stelios-Petros. (MG Michael Family Archives)

Maria stood resilient and unbreakable during the years of Tasos’s political exile, supporting her husband in every way she could, while at the same time dealing with her own pressures and making sure their young daughter was not too much affected. I early on noticed that she did not too much want to speak of those desolate years of persecution and poverty, though at times I tried to press her that I could learn more. But I soon realised that she considered this political upheaval a closed chapter not only in her own life, but also on the national scale. On the phone she would sometimes use the expression áγρια θúελλα [wild storm] for that turbulent period of Greece’s modern history. However, this experience did have a perceptible influence on her thinking and on the way she observed people. Despite her fragile appearance in her later years she did not lose her sharpness and was quick to discern any motives that were not healthy in those who would approach her. Often she would tell me, and how I would have wanted to have more regularly taken her counsel: “Michael, do be careful of the ‘black hats’.” Her observations on some literary stars and political heavyweights were in most instances proven correct. She was a grounded and discerning soul.

Back in the 1990s many households still communicated by way of the old rotary phones, and making an overseas call was no simple matter. It took some effort to get through and reach a loved one on the other side of the world. And yet, outside our regular correspondence, we would speak on the phone quite frequently. At one time, when as a much younger man I found myself in a life-defining crisis, Maria was one of my lasting supports, and provided me with the stability and wise counsel as would a mother her own child. Indeed, at the time I was young enough to be her son. She pointed to the tribulations she and Tasos had to face and to surmount, both before and after the exile, and how with perseverance, self-belief, and the company of like-minded friends, all was endured and overcome. One of the keys she would often tell, in that very same context of the “black hats” was to be very careful of all power institutions, including the church establishment. All the same, Maria as well as Vaso, were manifestly souls of faith who believed that in the end it was the Creator who organized the divine providence in our lives. They both held a deep love for the Holy Mother and delighted in the Great Feasts of the Church. Their letters and postcards are testimony to this belief, and even under the most testing duress when they were nearing the end of their lives, they would turn to the Theotokos to ask for her intercessions. I remained intrigued that after Maria learnt of my expertise in Apocalypticism she became fascinated by the Book of Revelation. There were telephone calls that were spent on dissecting the book to my friend’s satisfaction—and not necessarily the more well-known pericopes such as those referencing 666 and the plagues, but more so those places that spoke of Christ as the Saviour and the evidences to the general resurrection. “Ah! Mihalis” she would say, “really[?]… that is very good.” Even now, remembering these words, and hearing her voice, brings a joy to my spirit. I can literally speak of hearing her voice as I have recordings of Maria speaking to us on tapes, they are treasured by my family. These recordings were brought back by Helen at the behest of Maria herself. I will speak of Helen, who is still with us at ninety years old, in another place below.

Maria and Vaso had their own artistic leanings. Maria enjoyed writing and this was evident in her marvellous letters, and Vaso was a designer by training, having designed covers for her father’s books. In one of her letters which often arrived as packages with copies of Tasos’s older drafts, anthologies, photographs, and various articles, she had also included a sensitive poem. She had composed the verse for the poet’s ninth anniversary since his passing, written for me and Katina, I would later learn. Maria kept writing, even though she suffered greatly with arthritic fingers towards the end of her life. This correspondence cannot be lost, and so I hope one day to send to Stelios-Petros, or to the Kapodistrian University in Greece. Maria was much loved and embraced by Tasos’s illustrious friends who adored her. She was notably close to Yiannis Ritsos, Titus Patrikios, Mikis Theodorakis, George Tsagaris, and of course, other poets and composers, too, many of whom I did not know at the time. An occasion I am particularly fond of recalling was when Mikis had only just arrived to take Maria to a literary memorial in honour of Leivaditis. We were already speaking when the larger-than-life figure arrived, and almost immediately, Maria put him on the phone to speak with me. He spoke of the poet in the most endearing of terms, referring to him by the affectionate diminutive used by his friends, “Tasoulis”. Maria was never enamoured of celebrity. The legendary figures who were regular visitors in her life, both before and after the passing of her beloved husband, came without the fanfare. They were simply friends who happened to be recognised for their craft.

An example of how Maria viewed friendship can be seen in the close bond she formed with my eldest son’s godmother, Helen Constanti. Helen (Eleni / ‘Lella’) is also deserving of her own story. Her friendship with Maria, who regarded her as a sister—Maria herself had an older sister called Eleni—and with Vaso who held Lella in the same affection, is a long and remarkable one. If only to say, that after Tasos’s passing, Maria would not let anyone sit in his office chair—but she made an exception for Lella who had especially travelled to Greece from Australia to meet with her two dear friends. Maria loved trying to say to us on the phone: “kanggaroo” and “kooala” and we would burst out laughing over it! I was preparing a little collection of poetry with the tentative title “Metaphysical Umbrellas” and she was delighted by it. She told me Tasos would have been quite impressed. Needless to say that, too, stuck in my memory. She enjoyed these types of plays on words. Her letters hide her humour and this playful side of her personality that was much more evident when she was speaking with you. Perhaps, I thought, when it came to writing, she would have learnt from Tasos that words put down on paper took upon themselves another materialisation that needed a stricter precision, and a more deliberate placement. There existed a marvellous balance to her that would arrive naturally in all of her communications.

Two beautiful cards with those distinct expressions of love and faith, from Maria and Vaso. (MG Michael Family Archives)

From George Tsagaris to Helen Constanti expressing his joy at receiving Helen's version of "Fysaei". (MG Michael Family Archives)

To illustrate her love of friends, even though she might not have met them in the flesh, on the morning before Katina and I were to be married, twenty-four white roses arrived. These were from Maria. This fantastic surprise has held a special place in our hearts. I knew how much she appreciated flowers and that their gifting would remind her of Tasos himself, so this gift and the words that accompanied her love for us, took on an additional dimension. I loved hearing her laugh! It was a hearty joyful laugh, and this alone would make you happy. Yes, she had that terrific sense of humour, no doubt sharpened after years of listening to Tasos and reading between the lines of his writing that would carry all of those concealed meanings. Magical realism is by its very nature connected to surrealism. In her letters, but also during our many conversations, there were only scattered references to poets and writers. For she loved her friends with devotion for a lot more than their literary reputations. This is because she had shared huge life changing experiences with them, including the aftermaths of their exiles alongside Tasos in those brutal camps in the Aegean: Makronisos, Ai Stratis, Lemnos, Ikaria, Gyaros, and then the court trials—above all as I had come to understand, Ritsos, Theodorakis, and Patrikios, were noticeably close to her. The Greek Civil War (1946-1949) divided many Greeks to the end of their lives, but it also brought many others together. Maria had also developed a marked trust for the gentle-hearted composer George Tsagaris.[4] George had composed the music for the widely circulated album Φυσáει…—a compilation of Tasos’s poems put to music and delivered by that powerhouse voice of the Greek rock-balladeer, Vasilis Papakonstantinou.[5] Helen Constanti sang those very same selections, as a surprise gift to Maria who was so impressed that she forwarded the tape to Tsagaris. He not long after wrote to us to say it was a profoundly moving experience for him to hear his compositions sung in Australia, and sent all the way back to him Europe! George, too, adored Tasos, and Vasilis’s renditions of the poetry have since become folklore. In her early years, Lella was herself a highly respected singer and singled out by the legendary Stelios Kazantzidis when he toured Australia, but whose own trepidations in life brought her singing career to an early end.

To return to her humour. Maria was—and she would acknowledge much to her regret—a regular smoker. This was a habit she tried on numerous occasions to break. I would at the right moment take her to task, encouraging her to stop as I had become increasingly worried about her health. She would say to me: “Mihalis, you take care of the smoke in your own backyard!” And she would laugh that sweet laugh of hers that I have sorely missed, as I have Les’s sign off in his letters and cards: -“Blessings”, Les.- I had sent Maria two poems of Les Murray’s in Greek translation that I had drafted, and the next time we spoke she had some excellent questions to ask. She had spent time studying these translations and had shared them with friends. I had also sent her a number of early translations of Tasos’s that I had made into English and she asked for me to read these over the phone. I share recollections here that I have not spoken of before, but I want now at this time of my own journey, to set some of these down yet few and incomplete, not only for the record, but also should they be of interest to others.

This simple reflection in itself would not be complete without the most surreal of stories, and the unique insight into it that I have not seen anywhere else recorded—it has to do with the discovery of Leivaditis’s last manuscript The Manuscripts of Autumn. The anthology itself was published posthumously in 1990 two years after the poet’s death. It is well known that Maria found the manuscript in one of the drawers of the poet’s study. But what is not known is what compelled her to go looking for ‘something’. During one of our conversations I asked her to speak to me of that precious find. And what she added to the published version was wonderful and something that the magical realism of Tasos’s spirit would have revelled in! Maria told me she withheld this event for fear of diminishing from the unexpected find itself, but I felt, too, her natural apprehension of not being believed. On the night before her discovery she had a dream. I have tried to remember some of the finer details of that dream but they now elude me, however, this is not the point. She got out of bed and was compelled to go into the poet’s study. The next morning she returned to the study, and went through Tasos’s drawers again. And, there, ‘lo and behold’, the anthology buried beneath a stack of paper. Maria was not superstitious, her faith was healthy, so she had asked for my opinion and we both agreed, that at the very least, it was a fabulous coincidence and at best—a ‘nudge’ from the poet himself.[6] We know that towards the later years of his life, evidenced, at the same time from what is typically termed his “Third Period” (1979-1987), he explored more deeply the mystery of the person of Jesus Christ—more Tolstoyan (transcendent Christ), than Dostoevskian (human Christ). It was during this time The Blind Man with the Lantern (1983) was published, which included those enchanting 12 Conversations all beginning with the supplication “Lord” (Kyrie). Maria had told me, and this to the chagrin of some of his more left-leaning comrades, that he would not pass a church without stepping inside to light a candle, and that he had pinned numerous little paper icons on the inside of one of his coats. This, too, for her own good reasons, Maria was hesitant to make public. This is all I can say on the matter, for here, as well, I did not think it right that I should press her on the issue.

An invitation by maria to attend one of tasos’s literary memorials three years after the poet’s passing. (MG Michael FAMILY archives)

A selection of Tasos's anthologies together with the posthumously discovered The Manuscripts of Autumn, all precious gifts from Maria over the many years of a long correspondence. (MG Michael Family Archives)

I had asked for her favourite anthology of Tasos’s. The Manuscripts of Autumn, though before that it had been The Blind Man with the Lantern. And Drapetsona was her favourite of Leivaditis’s poems set to music.[7] And, even now I will still smile, for more than once she would quote these lines from Tasos’s The Blind Man… “God is not being able to sleep.” Similarly, she enjoyed Kafka and liked it when Leivaditis would be compared to Franz.

In one of her letters Maria would also gift to me, these overwhelmingly generous words (I will share below) that have kept my spirits from collapsing on this subject given the desire that I had nurtured, to begin on a long term adventure of translating Tasos into English. I had more than once received Maria’s blessing to do with this dream of mine. I had, sure enough, a number of translations already completed, but there is no actual purpose to them now as a friend has started on this priceless labour and done a very good job himself. My own translations have occasionally appeared in my journals and in my long essay on Tasos’s thematology.[8] This was the loving spirit of my friend, Maria Leivaditis, and but one of the many expressions of her compassionate-love:

“The eternal sleep of our Tasos, may not always be peaceful because you will be hurting, that he is no longer with us… but your verse, our dearest Michael: ‘I never hid it that it is from you / that I learnt poetry’, will bring him calm.” (M.L. to M.G., 19.3.96, Athens)

“Dear friend and poet [Michael], after your last letter I can now onwards call you friend. Indeed, you as is the same with Eleni, I feel you very dear friends like those who are next to me… I confess that I am deeply moved that Tasos’s verse fit and tie in so harmoniously with your own inspirations.” (M.L. to M.G., 4.12. 92, Athens)

The famous sketch of Tasos Leivaditis drawn by Tasos's and Maria's only grandchild, Stelios-Petros. Katina and I were the first to receive this charming portrait. (MG Michael Family Archives)

During our lifetime friendships will naturally come and go, even some of the more beautiful ones that we believed would never leave. But then there are those that will survive, and it is these that will endure above and beyond any tribulation or temporal separation. For they are forged in the blood-beat of the heart, and live on in the flutter of the angelwing.

“I also enclose a sketch of Leivaditis done by my grandson Stelios-Petros which he gifted to me. Copies of this sketch I am sending first of all to you and Eleni. He is self-taught and still young of age, only sixteen-years of age… and his grandfather was proud of him.” (M.L. to M.G., 15.10.93, Athens)

This nota bene that follows was inspired by Maria Leivaditis, Les Murray, George Cazouris, and George Kanarakis. Their absence has left a marked gap in my own life and the lives of their other friends, let alone the lives of their families. I have missed each of these beloved companions beyond words, and yet it is their very words that continue to reach out to comfort me and to remind me of things I must not forget.

One of the hardest decisions one has to make (and particularly when private correspondence becomes part of a literary or historical record), what to do with letters accumulated over many decades of correspondence. It is a racking responsibility determining which letters should be kept and archived for future generations to read, enjoy, and learn from, and which should be returned to the families of one’s correspondents. Most difficult of all, deciding which should be destroyed, but sometimes even that must be done. Letters are confessional by their very nature, and I believe that, in many instances, both sender and recipient have entered into an unspoken understanding that some exchanges are never intended to be made public. I know this is what I have wanted and asked for myself. There are letters whose personal content could far outweigh their archival value. In all likelihood, I belong to an old school that believes the letter, certainly in a moral sense, has two owners, though legally that might not technically be the case. Yes, sometimes our letters are written with the express desire they survive, and that, at the right hour, they might be shared. Where a beloved of mine has passed away, I have a fairly good judgement of what their wishes might ultimately have been. If I am uncertain, I would hope to err on the side of protecting the intimacy of trust. Nowadays, the same goes especially for our emails. I hope that sometime in the future, the same compassionate discernment might be equally afforded to me.

On a more personal note, if this should be of interest, no few of those bonds that I have mentioned, have been, and continue to be, with wonderful writers and fabulous thinkers, and their correspondence has become part of the record of these friendships. Looking back, it is only rarely that I was asked to read a letter and then to destroy it—and when I have been asked, I have done so immediately. There have also been those few occasions when I have gone back to my letters and decided, with a palpable sadness, that I should not keep a particular one. This is another dimension of the practise of compassion, to keep on loving beyond those limitations of the temporal spaces.

I feel a great deal of joy in sharing this small selection of Maria’s correspondence with you here below. This sample serves a dual purpose. First and foremost, it reveals Maria as a writer of meaningfully beautiful letters; a protector of Tasos’s legacy; the love of her only grandchild, Stelios-Petros; and together with her dearest daughter Vaso, a soul of unconditional faith. Then, also, her incredible gift to me that has oftentimes, and even to this very day lifted my spirits, that she discerned something of her beloved husband in my humble person. And especially during these recent times in my life, this has been of a very special significance—it was as if she knew. More than once I felt that beneath her words, both spoken and written, there were things she wanted to be made known at the right hour.

A sample of Maria Leivaditis's fabulous letters and these ones are with their own special significance. (MG Michael Family Archives)

[1] I did not wish to probe too much into these early years for I could see it was not a place she was too comfortable to readily revisit. An excellent timeline of Maria’s and Tasos’s more important milestones can be found in a special issue of ΔΙΑΒΑΖΩ, Vol. 228, 1989. Maria herself had sent me this collection of essays and she was very proud of them. I had been planning to write a dissertation on the poet and had already made quite a number of translations of Tasos’s prose but health and other issues would later intervene so this dream of ours that I had planned for my retirement years would not be realised. In that very same issue with the chronology of Tasos’s life, Maria herself had made at least two corrections in blue pen. The first where it is said that Tasos [Anastasios] was born Panteleimon-Anastasios, Maria had drawn lines over the name Panteleimon. In that same paragraph she repeated that deletion at a similar reference. She was meticulous with anything to do with the poet’s legacy and would make sure to correct the record.

[2] https://stepeha.wixsite.com/tasosleivaditis/blank

[3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0L-9DGywy4

[4] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=958fasnXjrQ&t=10s

[5] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9p_nWAPeT5U&list=RD9p_nWAPeT5U&start_radio=1

[6] I have no written evidence for this marvellous story. Only what I have remembered from all of that time ago. Maria and I spoke of so many things that I hope to write another essay on what I can still reasonably recollect from our telephone talks on Tasos’s life and poetry.

[7] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoVCJmId5TU&list=RDPoVCJmId5TU&start_radio=1

[8] https://www.mgmichael.com/tasos

For ‘Cecil’ and ‘Wendy’ and the Other Angels

I did not plan on writing to my friends again this soon. Yet, just as a musician cannot help but put down the lyrics of a beautiful song, so it is with one who writes when pressed by a stirring in the heart or by an image that they simply cannot let go. And that is why, despite my determination to refrain for the hour, I was left with little choice after an encounter this morning (August 27, 2026)—I have called these types of encounters “angelic”. These fabulous events are not rare. Look around, you will find them in so many places. Sometimes, yes, they are hidden. Other times they look for you and will cry out to you as the stones in the Gospel (Lk. 19:40). How blessed we are, and this beyond measure, to be able to bring peace and comfort to another soul. Ultimately, I have come to see, and it has been proven time and time again, that we are all—all of us, capax Dei.

In the mornings, once I have taken care of my ablutions, given thanks, and dropped off our youngest to school, I will normally head off to one of our local cafes to have breakfast and a cup of coffee. Where I have been going of late, and at that particular time, I meet up with two large groups of elderly folk, many of whom are plainly suffering from different ailments— and if I could not see it, I would know about it! At the start I did not want to hear about these problems this early in the morning, but also because it would remind me too much of my own story. I did not want for this to be occupying my mind at the start of the day. Still, I kept going, for I knew that I would very well miss them one day, and so I befriended a number of these wonderful warriors of life. I ask about their lives, where they originally came from, their occupations, and their advice on how to best navigate life. A little more on that later. Only last week, let us call him Cecil for now, I found that we were both going through the same disease. I was much encouraged by this former British naval gunner who had emigrated to Australia in the 1970s from Cumbria. But the story that I am writing tonight concerns someone else. An elderly lady who was sitting alone. I had seen her once or twice before, but she did not seem to be in anybody’s particular company.

I stood up to leave and as I looked behind me, there was a quiet voice. I wished this graceful soul, a good morning. I had assumed she had wished me the same. But, smiling, she looked up at me from her seat, and said again: “Did you enjoy your coffee?” I said, “yes”, with the intention to quickly leave, for I had chores to attend to. But it would be closer to the truth, if I were to say, that I simply was not in the mood for more chit-chat. At that moment I saw that beautiful smile again on her face. You could even describe it as a wink. It was as if she knew. For she had very likely, in her recent years, felt this cold-shouldering no few times before. I could not move, even if I had wanted to. Did she remind me of my mother? Did guilt at my initial response weigh me down? Or perhaps, most incredible of all, did I see myself in her pleading eyes? Whatever the reasons, and they do not matter now, I sat down opposite her and asked her where she had originally come from? Let us call her, in this instance, Wendy. We were both from Sydney in the first place, and had lived only one suburb apart. So we could have crossed paths somewhere, all those years ago. And this is why magical realism is not so fictional at times. She had moved to the South Coast with her police-officer husband and two little boys—one of whom is a well-known cyclist. She worked for many years in an Illawarra hospital as a receptionist and charity organiser. Of course, like the tone marks that aid students of Chinese poetry, there was much more to Wendy, as there was to Cecil. Michael Leunig has written of The Crowdless Man: “[h]is gaze and yearning are way outside the loop, His pilgrimage has lots of holes in it. See him wandering alone Beaming to himself.”

So what am I trying to say here, and why have I been so compelled to write down what I am experiencing right now, and then to share it with you? I keep returning to certain themes that connect us. Fragility. Contradictions. Vulnerability. Our deeper need to be completed, along with all that comes with being human. No one can escape the human condition, and the profounder our exploration of the fundamental nature of our existence, the more difficult it becomes not to have compassion, not to practise forgiveness, and not to exercise charity in all of its forms. That is to love, as best we can, to aim for that archetypical ideal of laying down our lives for the other. Especially in academia, where egos can become almost unmanageable and here I know what I am talking about, for I am not exempt (I was a professor once upon a time), we can too easily, and too often, ignore the more real and enduring places of our legacy. At the last hour, citations and h-index will not matter too much. Rumi speaks in the strongest terms, and perhaps rather scandalously for some, of taking the bad side of the ego to the “slaughterhouse”. At the end of our time on earth, many of us will ask ourselves, how close we ever came to experiencing that selfless, sacrificial love:

Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends. (Jn 15:13)

In the slaughterhouse of love, they kill only the best... [d]on't run away from this dying. Whoever's not killed for love is dead meat. (Rumi)

pHOTO BY Jakub Pierożyński

This elderly lady with those pleading eyes, the one we have for now, referred to as Wendy, speaks to me and tests me again. As I write, I see her here, sitting right beside me, for I am drafting these paragraphs in the very same place this morning (September 1, 2026). Why did I want to get away so quickly? What did I have to do that morning that could possibly measure up to helping make another human being a little happier and more valued? Yes, perhaps I was frightened by seeing my own reflection in her eyes as I approach her universe. But that was no excuse. Another soul was pleading for some respite, some acknowledgement of her presence and meaningfulness in the world. And by stopping to speak with her, by trying my best to listen, I learnt more of pastoral theology and of the loveliness of Emmanuel Levinas’s “the Other”. Which is, that the person standing before us, will in many ways transcend their physical presence—not unlike a glass-stained window when the light passes through it.

Nota bene: And one of the most common counsels from these warriors of life? “Keep yourself busy” and—“get your priorities right.”

On the grief of losing the love of a beautiful friend

In the end, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends. (Martin Luther King Jr., Trumpet of Conscience)

Whenever someone who knows you disappears, you lose one version of yourself. Yourself as you were seen, as you were judged to be. Lover or enemy, mother or friend, those who know us construct us, and their several knowings slant the different facets of our characters like diamond cutter’s tools. (Salman Rushdie, The Ground Beneath Her Feet)

I have, of course, broached this subject in other ways, but never, I think, with the same weight that I now carry in my heart. What encourages me to continue writing these little essays, which have taken on a more discernibly urgent mood in recent times, is not only the wonderful support with which you have received them, but also the knowledge that I am speaking to realities common to the human condition. Indeed, many of you will have lived through experiences much like those I have described and, in many cases, have addressed them far more eloquently than I could hope to do. And, yet, it is good that we speak to one and other in such ways, meeting in those places of vulnerability where so much of our hidden truth resides.

There is a suffering that can, for those who live with chronic pain, go deeper than the ache felt in the bones. It is the grief of being rejected by someone we love. These are the people whose faces fill our photo albums and with whom we have shared some of the largest moments of joy and sorrow in our life. Their absence can leave a wound that could seem impossible to heal. The relationships we had with these souls are of different degrees, and each loss brings with it a discrete sorrow to the heart. Here I will reflect on the loss of a like-minded friend, one who had for a season stuck closer than a brother (Prov. 18:24). The importance and archetypal beauty of friendship has been celebrated throughout the arts, and magnificently in the great epic narratives of Homer, to the searing confession of St. Gregory Nazianzus on the loss of his friend St. Basil the Great, and the notable essays on the same subject by C. S. Lewis:

For a friend with an understanding heart is worth no less than a brother. (Homer, The Odyssey)

Do not leave me here;  / Do not, I beg: I swear upon your tomb, / Never will I forget you and move on; / I could not, if I wanted. (St. Gregory Nazianzus, Poems)

Eros will have naked bodies; Friendship naked personalities. (C. S. Lewis, The Four Loves)

Friendship is also attributed to our Creator and is a recurring motif common in the Scripture, and in Buddhism it is considered essential to one’s spiritual growth:

And the scripture was fulfilled that says, “Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness,” and he was called God’s friend. (Jm. 2:23)

The friend who is a helper, the friend through thick and thin, the friend who gives good counsel, and the compassionate friend; these four are friends indeed. The wise understand this and attend on them carefully, like a mother her own child.  (The Buddha, Sigalovada Sutta)

When Jesus Christ himself, was abandoned by his closest disciples during the hours of his most gruelling testing, at the Gethsemane temptation when they would fall asleep (and no less than on three occasions), and then on Calvary where outside of John they all would later flee, he allowed for the frailty of the human condition and freely gave of the benefit of the doubt knowing that: “[t]he spirit is willing, but the flesh is weak” (Matt. 26:41). Later he would build his Church on St. Peter “the Rock”, the one who had also denied him three times at the courtyard of the high priest. This is what a great benevolence a friend can deliver to another by crushing the silence and allowing for love and compassion to lift the other to their most utmost potential. Yes, as friends, we, too, do possess such ‘godly’ power to raise the other by not too quickly extinguishing the prospects of reconciliation. This was the same with Saints Peter and Paul, strongly antagonistic the one towards the other, to eventually reconcile and then to lay down the first foundations of the Church. So we do not give up hope. The seed that once gave birth to the oak though now made complete, lives on in the acorn. Friendships that were originally built on love are rarely completely extinguished, we sometimes only need but a little distance to allow for nature and for the deeper humanity to take their course.

One common trap in our grief is to deny that these individuals were true friends in the first place, and so we start to look for those ‘obvious’ patterns that might now prove it. Every previous slight or let down take on another more sinister connotation. Such counsel is short-term comfort and in the end doomed to failure. It can only contribute to an ongoing agonising. To begin with, it seems to me, to be self-contradictory. Such a negative perspective could suggest the same for ourselves. That is, were we too, then, not true friends? Relationships built over years of genuine concord and treasured experiences cannot be pretended. It does not take too long for fakery to manifest itself. And so, they were true friends to us, as we were to them. For this precious gift alone, it is good to be thankful. It is a difficult truth, especially if we have been deeply wounded, to accept that in almost every instance there was a strong love between the two souls. It is only natural when the pain goes deep, to look for any way out that might alleviate some of that suffering. Halfway through one of the most fabulous violin performances of Vivaldi’s “Winter” strings from Ray Chen’s bow broke. He continued to play. The music did not suffer and it went its course. Despite this visible disruption, the beauty of the score was not diminished.

The word concord comes from the Latin concordia (meaning harmony or agreement), which is built from con- (together) and cor (heart). Literally, it means "hearts together". It entered English through Old French (concorde) in the 12th century to mean peace, union, or friendly agreement. (Wiktionary)

https://unsplash.com/photos/two-woman-sitting-on-beach-sand-while-facing-sunlight-hkkQbPa49UA

The grief we live through, this intense emotional sorrow ordinarily associated with mourning, is caused by the "remembrance of things past," to recall Marcel Proust. A photograph; a song; a road; a scent; a Christmas gathering. A laugh you hear in the shopping mall that you would swear was your friend. Then you see the beloved. It IS them. They walk straight past or worse, they turn their back on you. These are excruciating moments should you experience them. These souls inhabit big pieces of our life. One can hurt from a difficult disease but the pain at such a blatant rejection can stay with you for years. It can cut in places deeper than that ache to the bones. So what happened? A miscommunication? An innocent mistake? A misplaced word spoken in anger? Not being there at a needful time because you could not. Ultimately, not being that ‘perfect’ friend. Who can be—and who has been able to measure up perfectly to that ideal? Yet, here is the archetypal form of the brother friend, to accept the one and other within the full realm of the graces, to be wise enough to at least accept, that we are all liable at some unforeseen moments in our life to fall short of the mark.

How can one respond to this unspeakable pain of a beloved’s silence? The recognition that we are all fragile and broken in the secret places, goes some way towards not only battling this grief but to also have compassion for our friend, they, too, are carrying their own cross in life. We are all looking to be loved and to be rescued from those burdens that haunt our hearts the most. Spending the remainder of our lives blaming the other for their silence will ultimately prove annihilating. Being the first to reach out requires both courage and vulnerability, and some friendships are worth the risk of a second rejection. That said, repeated attempts are not good for either of the souls. One might become more hardened in spirit, while the other could plunge further into grief. So there will come an hour when we must accept that things are unlikely to change. It will be the time to stop interrogating ourselves and the past in search of answers. This will be the moment when we have to make our own closure and not wait indefinitely for the other to deliver it. Our worth and dignity are not diminished when we are rejected. Self-identity and selfhood are not dependent on another’s perception of our presence and value in the world.

Our life’s journey and the gifts that we can offer to others and build on already existing meaningful friendships, do not all of a sudden come to an end because we might have been “ghosted”—and such a terrible word. Though very difficult at first, this rejection which in the beginning could appear to us to be impossible to overcome, will open the door to not only a profounder awareness of the self, but also to the founding of new friendships—and oftentimes in those places we might not have expected—on a city street in the middle of a downpour or in the corridors of a hospital ward. These new friendships will play their own significant part in carrying us through to the remainder of our lives. When our final days arrive, whenever that might be, we will be surrounded by those who have truly loved us, who have recognised the good intentions of our hearts, and who have inspired the best in us. As difficult as it might now be to believe, this terrible pain inflicted by those who were once dearest friends will, at that last hour be entirely forgotten, for they too would have by this time entered even more deeply into our hearts.

This day is not your final destination

Wait for the Lord; / be strong and take heart / and wait for the Lord. (Ps. 27:14)

Come to me, all you who are weary and burdened, and I will give you rest. Take my yoke upon you and learn from me, for I am gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. For my yoke is easy and my burden is light. (Matt. 11:28-30)

There are places of experience in life that unless we have entered into them ourselves, we can only theorise and paraphrase what we have read. As a much younger theologian on my pastoral calls, though with the best of intentions in my heart, I still could not rightly grasp the depths of the suffering when comforting a parent who had lost their child, or of a distressed soul that was in a battle with a terminal disease. It is precisely the same when it comes to those interior and invisible battles that we fight in the mind. One can see a broken arm in a cast, for example, and offer empathy, but a mind that is hurting could be dismissed, for the "cast" cannot be seen. The true understanding will invariably come only from those kindred souls who have themselves entered into these deeper places of Gethsemane, where they, too, have agonised in their own pain and asked of their Creator to lift the cup of sorrows from their heart.

Being an Eastern Orthodox theologian I had the most wonderful literature in my hands, most of it meaningful and impactful, and if it helped when I was ministering, and indeed it did, but only for a while. How were those suffering souls to get through the night, when the momentary comfort offered to them as a sweet balm, was to wear off after we had all gone home. Who could in truth understand the depths of their anguish? As Henri Nouwen had said from his own experience, only “wounded healers” are able to bring healing to others. Is this not once and for all demonstrated by our Lord’s sacrifice on the Cross? Later we will find this divine charity expressed in the early church’s first Christological hymn that pointed to the God-Man’s kenosis, Phil. 2:5:11: “And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself by becoming obedient to death—even death on a cross!” (v. 8). Of course, this cannot mean that we do not reach out to others whose pain we might not fully comprehend. As Christians, as human beings, we are called to minister to all peoples, but as we are told by our great teachers of pastoral wisdom, there are times when our presence alone could oftentimes be enough. They refer to this ‘being there’ as a “compassionate presence.” A tender-hearted embrace could mean much more than some well-intentioned parroted words. To console someone who is on the precipice of despair requires love in practise, and large amounts of intercessory prayer.

Being weak in health as you yourself are, I cannot fail to feel much sympathy for your plight. But kind Providence is not only more wise than we are; It is also wise in a different way. It is this thought which must sustain us in all our trials, for it is consoling, as no other thought is. (Elder Macarius of Optina)

Love is the only way to grasp another human being in the innermost core of his personality. No one can become fully aware of the very essence of another human being unless he loves him. By his love he is enabled to see the essential traits and features in the beloved person; and even more, he sees that which is potential in him, which is not yet actualized but yet ought to be actualized. Furthermore, by his love, the loving person enables the beloved person to actualize these potentialities. By making him aware of what he can be and of what he should become, he makes these potentialities come true. (Viktor Frankl, Man’s Search for Meaning)

What then of suicidal ideation that originally prompted this small reflection. To begin with some fundamentalist communities might have us believe this is unacceptable for a practising Christian. But for those who are familiar with the Word of God, and with the hagiographical tradition of our Church, they would know that melancholia, for this is the correct word and not the commonly expressed depression, and which William Styron did very well to point out in recent times, is not unfamiliar to those who have loved our Lord. And not ironically, to those who have been the more passionately desirous of His presence in their lives, often the hurt could be more— for His absence at certain hours could seem unbearable. This condition is particularly evident in the lives of the Old Testament prophets who were tasked with some outwardly impossible missions by an “invisible” God that was not yet manifested in the Incarnation. Do recall those persevering prophets, Job, Elijah, King David, Heman son of Korah, Ezekiel, Jeremiah, and the others.

If the only home I hope for is the grave, if I spread out my bed in the realm of darkness, if I say to corruption, ‘You are my father,’ and to the worm, ‘My mother’ or ‘My sister,’ where then is my hope—who can see any hope for me? (Job 17:13-15)

Elijah was afraid and ran for his life. When he came to Beersheba in Judah, he left his servant there, while he himself went a day’s journey into the wilderness. He came to a broom bush, sat down under it and prayed that he might die. “I have had enough, Lord,” he said. “Take my life; I am no better than my ancestors.” Then he lay down under the bush and fell asleep. (1 Kgs 19:3:5)

All of these souls, mortal and subject to the uncertainties of the human condition, like you and me, entered into the deepest depths of melancholia. After that tribulation to emerge giants of our faith. To become first-hand witnesses not only to the power of prayer and the attainable knowledge of our Creator, but also testifying to the extraordinary resilience of the human spirit, as Christ Himself did reveal in Gethsemane in facing that most momentous crisis of his earthly life, to ultimately place everything before the Father: “If you are willing, remove this cup for me; nevertheless, not my will, but yours be done” (Lk. 22:42). Ministering to those brothers and sisters experiencing this compressing trial, what has helped in my prayer time with them, is to confess that this test has also not been absent from me; that not a few of our saints have themselves been tempted by this dread and have been delivered from their mental ordeal; importantly, they [we] are not to feel guilty, for these responses to life are not absent from the universal human experience.  Moreover, to reflect daily on the covenantal promises of our God:

No temptation has overtaken you except what is common to mankind. And God is faithful; he will not let you be tempted beyond what you can bear. But when you are tempted, he will also provide a way out so that you can endure it. (1 Cor. 10:13)

Photo by Klara Kulikova on Unsplash

We have an additional advantage, while secular psychotherapy aims to treat the mind or psyche, in the Church our pastoral counselling also seeks the healing of the nous, the “eye of the soul” or spiritual centre, and through participation, too, in the life-affirming and medicinal Sacraments. We have been blessed with many spiritual tools to heal and to comfort the deeply distressed, to remind them as often as might be needed, they are not alone—and that one keeps living because they are precious and unique in the divine providence of their Maker, that He has wonderful plans for them from even before they were born: “Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, before you were born, I set you apart” (Jer. 1:5). Be an active listener and remind the broken brother or sister, their story matters and that their best days are still ahead. Celebrate their achievements and inspire them to keep moving forward with endurance and perseverance. This dreadful sadness that is at this very hour compressing their spirit, making it seem that all is lost, is not their final destination. We are not broken. We are healing. They are us and we are them. There is still work to do before we finish the race—and new opportunities to love and to be loved, to create and to inspire creation in others. Day by day, all will be well. Keep busy with meaningful things and surround yourself with sympathetic, gentle souls. A new day dawns tomorrow. Wait for it.

Questions that we can only answer under the firelight

“If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone.” (Rom. 12:18)

“For others, in spite of myself, from myself.” (Emmanuel Levinas) 

I recently received one of those beautiful letters from a friend that lifts your spirits and reminds you not only of the vital importance of friendship, but also that the world contains far more tender-hearted people than we might imagine. The letter, an email in truth, was sent to encourage me during this season of my journey. These wonderful words rich in compassion were to be understood as a sign of love and affection from a gentle and discerning soul. I reflected on this letter for some time and I have turned to it often, and to others of a similar humanity. What strikes me above all with such compassionate expressions of solidarity is something all of our true friends have in common, and this is not only the depth and elevation of their souls, but also their practice of giving others the “benefit of the doubt.” What is the benefit of the doubt? And what does it mean in the context of friendship but also in our broader communion with other people, or in other words, the Levinasian “Other”.

These oftentimes, life-giving words “the benefit of the doubt,” are, unless I am mistaken, a direct evolution from the legal principle “of reasonable doubt.” As flawed human beings ourselves we are severely limited to the truth, and could possess only a skewed perspective on reality. To give the benefit of the doubt will not rarely mean to dramatically change a life, to affect generations, and to even save a soul. It is to accept in ‘good faith’ that the other’s intentions were not malevolent or intended to cause harm, that whatever actions we might have misread as wrong were unintended or yes, even a mistake from a place of a momentary weakness or lapse of judgement. It is, of course, a lot easier for older souls to practise this precious charity on account of their familiarity of the human condition with all of its fragilities and contradictions. And the fact, that they too, have been the recipients of this grace, and are now paying it forward. One of the more significant reasons why this grace is withheld is its closeness to the ideal of forgiveness. Ordinarily, it can be difficult to distinguish between the two, though forgiveness is typically much harder, since it involves a reciprocal movement of humility and self-knowledge.

The benefit of the doubt might also challenge our own ethics, forcing us to confront uncomfortable truths about ourselves. This could in some instances prove frightening. We may come to believe that we are capable of what ‘bad’ we might suppose in others, and so we see in the other only that which we could perceive within ourselves. If we do not trust, we may begin to doubt our own capacity to be trustworthy. These are difficult questions that we can only answer under the firelight. What then are the enduring profits of presuming innocence and granting a second chance? In short, it can save a fellow human being from a lifetime of anxiety and anguish, and in some instances, as I have already written, literally save a life. An action of grace once seeded can bring delight to those who come after us and establish new friendships and communities of love; an action made in ‘bad faith’ can create enmities that once established will normally also replicate into the future. I must confess, despite my age and experience, I still cannot fully understand how someone can willingly punish another for a perceived wrong, knowing full well that in the end no good can ever come of it.

“As the Searcher of hearts, the Lord knows that men are liable to very frequent trespass, and that, having fallen, they often rise up again; therefore He has given us the commandment to frequently forgive trespasses, and He Himself is the first to fulfill His holy word. As soon as you say from your whole heart, ‘I repent,’ you will be immediately forgiven.” (St. John of Kronstadt)

https://pin.it/3pKNx83Fk | Faith hope Love art

My own heart is a long way from perfect. I will stray and have strayed from my creed, the one I still dare to preach. I am still learning “the good” (the agathon), praying that as the days pass, I remove as many barriers as I can in the pursuit of this virtue. People are inherently compassionate and charitable, this too I have found, when you thirst and ask for a cup of water, by far the majority will offer you that cup. And if we might remember this truth, giving the benefit of the doubt, not forgetting how delightful it could be both to the one and to the other, the offering of this noble gift becomes much harder to withhold. If you could allow me one further point, especially for my younger readers, this does not mean to be naive to the darker aspects of the human condition. In time, you will come to recognise these landscapes of brokenness, and through them you will enter those deeper places where the harvest is more bountiful still, for you will be asked to practise even harder things. This is the road of Gethsemane, the journey into the profound mystery and movement of love and forgiveness. One of the greatest things we can do in this life, is to give hope to the “Other” and to release them from their anguish that they might not only flourish, but that they themselves will soon enough pay it forward. Invariably, it will also bring out the best in ourselves, we will come nearer to our true name. Yes, I am more and more returning to old places and familiar spaces, but it is in truth all I know that could be of any use.